


In a significant shift for the tech industry, TikTok and Snap Inc. have reached settlement agreements just as a landmark trial begins in Los Angeles.
This trial marks the first time social media giants will face a jury over allegations that their platforms were deliberately designed to addict children, leading to severe mental health crises.
The case centers on a 19-year-old plaintiff, identified as “KGM,” who alleges that social media platforms utilized "slot machine-style" behavioral techniques to hook young users. The lawsuit claims these design choices—aimed at maximizing advertising revenue—exacerbated depression and suicidal thoughts.
By focusing on product design rather than the content itself, the plaintiffs aim to bypass Section 230, the federal law that traditionally shields tech companies from liability for third-party posts.
TikTok & Snap Inc.: Both companies have settled for undisclosed sums. While TikTok has settled this specific case, it remains a defendant in hundreds of other personal injury lawsuits and faces separate legal action from over a dozen states.
Meta (Instagram/Facebook) & Google (YouTube): These companies remain as the primary defendants in the current Los Angeles County Superior Court trial.
Executive Testimony: High-profile figures, including Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, are expected to testify during the 6-to-8-week trial.
Meta and Google have denied the allegations, maintaining that, they argue that teen mental health is influenced by academic pressure, socio-economics, and substance abuse, rather than a single factor like social media.
They highlight a "longstanding commitment" to safety, citing the implementation of parental controls and age-verification tools and maintain they should not be held responsible for the content posted by users.
This is a "bellwether trial," meaning its outcome will set the tone for thousands of similar lawsuits nationwide. Beyond this case, over 40 state attorneys general have filed suits against Meta, and a separate trial in New Mexico is scheduled to address allegations that Meta failed to protect minors from sexual exploitation.
Comment