Saturday, 22 August 2026

The UK Bans Social Media for Children Under 16 Following Australia’s Lead

BT International Desk
Disclosure : 15 Jun 2026, 05:18 PM Update : 16 Jun 2026, 12:43 AM
Photo: Collected
Photo: Collected

The UK has announced a sweeping ban on social media use for children under 16, expanding restrictions to include online gaming and livestreaming platforms. This move establishes one of the world's strictest online regulatory frameworks.

Announcing the decision on Monday (June 15), UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer emphasized that this major regulatory shift aims to protect children’s physical and mental well-being.

“It is clear to me a full ban is the right choice,” Starmer said. He acknowledged the enforcement challenges ahead but affirmed the government’s resolve to stand up to major technology companies (Big Tech).

Mounting Pressure on Big Tech The UK has increasingly tightened its stance against tech giants in recent years. Companies have faced strict demands to introduce age verification systems, adjust algorithms, and prevent the sharing of explicit images by minors.

However, growing awareness of the mental health risks tied to excessive screen time prompted the government to pursue stronger action. Influenced by Australia’s recent legislation, Starmer decided to take this decisive step.

Following the Australian Model In December of last year, Australia became the first nation to ban children under 16 from platforms like TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook. Australia's move sparked a global conversation, with several countries now considering similar access controls to shield children from online harm.

Strong Public Support The UK government shaped the new restrictions after consulting teachers, parents, and young people. The proposed measures go beyond a complete ban for under-16s, exploring mandatory overnight curfews, app time limits, and the removal of addictive design features like "infinite scrolling."

A public survey garnered over 116,000 responses from parents, tech insiders, and youth:

90% of parents supported raising the minimum age for social media use to 16.

83% of parents stated that the risks of social media far outweigh the benefits.

Skepticism Remains While parents and politicians heavily back the ban, some psychologists and researchers caution that there is no concrete evidence proving a blanket ban will work. Additionally, a group of schoolchildren told Reuters that their relationship with technology is highly complex, making the ban a subject of mixed feelings among the youth

  • Latest

  • Popular

Kolkata Fire / Relatives Leave With Bodies of Bangladeshi Victims

1

BOU VC Congratulates Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir on His Election as President

2

Abandoned by Family the 2-Year-Old Finds Care in Morelganj UNO

3

Shoriful’s Five-Wicket Haul Puts Australia Under Pressure in Mackay Test

4

Abdul Hai Shikder and Shabnam Mustari to Receive Nazrul Medal 2026

5

Fire Breaks Out in Dhaka-Bound Bus, 30 Passengers Rescued in Ramu

6

TikTok to Pay $400m in U.S. Major Child Privacy Lawsuit Settlement

7

Arsenal, Marseille and Real Betis Begin League Campaigns With Wins

8

15-Year-Old Schoolgirl Saved from Child Marriage in Monohardi

9

US Imposes 50% Tariffs on Canada as Trade Talks Collapse

10

President Mirza Fakhrul Pays Tribute at National Martyrs’ Memorial

11

Gold Prices Rise Again, 22-Karat Gold Hits Tk.246,110 per Bhori in Bangladesh

12

Government Announces New Cabinet Portfolios After Major Reshuffle

13

Bangladesh Bowled Out for 64 as Starc Runs Riot in Mackay Test

14

UN Secretary-General Election / UN Security Council Holds 2nd Straw Poll for Next Secretary-General

15

Tesla and 8 Automakers Recall 4.3 Million Cars in China Over Safety

16

Coast Guard Seizes 3 Tons of Banned Polythene in Bhola Raid

17

Andalib Rahman Partha Sworn In as Minister: Joyful Celebrations Erupt in Bhola

18

England vs Pakistan 1st Test / England Crush Pakistan by an Innings and 103 Runs

19

Prince Harry, Elton John Ordered to Pay Daily Mail £9.5m After Losing Privacy Case

20